Connect Communications For Quality Telephone Services

In today’s modern age, the concept of outsourced receptionist services might seem like it’s a little dated. Nothing could be further from the truth. It’s easy to lose sight of the human element involved in conducting business transactions, but when I outsourced my receptionist needs to Connect Communications it turned out that I was making one of the best business decisions I’ve made in recent memory. It’s saved me time and money, and made it easier for me to organise and schedule the needs of my business – as well as freeing me up to meet personal obligations in a way that my business often interfered with before.

Telephone Services for Small Businesses

I own and operate a small business providing digital marketing services to various professional industries, particularly the legal and medical industries. It’s a fun and informative business that brings me into contact with new people on a regular basis, while teaching me a lot about various professional specialties that I would otherwise not have the chance to learn. That’s come in handy, once or twice, but when I was first approached about the idea of paying another company to provide receptionist services, I was somewhat doubtful.

The thirty-day trial changed all of that. Connect Communications offers a service that makes them an efficient and high-performing member of your team. Within the first week of my trial, I realized just how much time I had been spending checking messages, consolidating information, filtering, and gathering actionable information from a wide range of contacts. Connect handles everything for me; I’m no longer bothered by wrong numbers, irrelevant messages, and redundant information. I can efficiently organize my time around what I need to get done. By the end of two weeks, I was feeling far less “stretched” and over-worked, and the quality of the services that I provide had improved measurably.

Thanks to Connect taking some of the burden off of my shoulders, I’ve actually managed to accumulate additional clients. I sincerely don’t believe would have been available to me if I were still handling messages and phone communications directly and in real-time. Meanwhile, Connect’s staff is courteous, professional, and friendly; they do an amazing job. I’ve had clients comment on how much more enjoyable it is to talk to a person than to a machine, and there is a previously unexpected boost in prestige associated with the fact that I am now perceived as having a staff of my own. My services are taken more seriously, and there is a heightened sense of professionalism associated with what I do. This is something I’ve long been seeking after, without success, as a self-employed professional.

Absolutely Free 30-Day Trial

If you don’t believe me, go ahead and check out Connect Communications’ free trial. You’ll get thirty days’ worth of services, absolutely free, during which you can decide whether or not they’re worth continuing with for yourself. I’m confident that you’ll make the same decision that I did; Connect Communications is affordable, reliable, and offers high-quality services of the sort that I was almost convinced no longer existed in today’s business world.

Few Underreported Environmental Problems that are current

green energy concept

Nearly 170, on March 22nd,000 gallons of large maritime gas put into Galveston Bay about the Florida coastline after two industrial ships collided within the active river. On March 24th, in Indiana, power giant BP built as much as 1600 gallons of gas — a mixture of tar sands gas and domestic raw from Europe — into Lake Michigan, the main supply of drinking tap water for the seven-million citizens in Chicago. And 000 gallons of pipe gas released right into a character preserve in Ohio. Meanwhile, the Elk Water chemical leak, which polluted the drinking tap water of 300,000 West Virginians of Jan, proceeds to scare people, a lot of whom continue to be not washing or consuming inside it.

Pollution is definitely a recognized price of power manufacturing that is inexpensive, especially in states eager for careers. Major Power is just a potent existence in California, working difficult to defang the companies assigned with guarding the nationis natural sources and stomach environmental legislation and also to stop. Fragile or obsolete regulations regulating harmful substances, and also the lack of following systems standard error or significant consequence for leaks and gas leaks provides the flexibility to keep damaging to business.

Within the last 12 months, a rash of chemical situations and disastrous gas, coal ash have outlined how severe ecological destruction has become regular training. Here are a few of the worst.

The Big Lies About Alternative Energy of big Fat

Because the Beach gas catastrophe this year, BP has invested vast sums of advertisement bucks to clean its picture like a filthy-power giant. Within the newest Television advertisement of the company’s, the sunlight is whirled within by wind generators like a voiceover guarantees and boasts the amount of National jobs developed by BP, “We Are trying to gas America for decades in the future.” There is only one issue: the dedication to wind-energy of BP is practically nonexistent.

In April, BP declared that it’s promoting off its whole $3.1 million U.S. wind-energy enterprise – including 16 facilities spread across eight states – as “section of an ongoing work to be always a more concentrated gas and oil business,” based on a company representative. Certainly, although it notoriously renamed itself “Beyond Oil” in 2000, the solar power company was exited by BP in 2011. Nowadays, its alternative-energy opportunities are restricted to a single wind park along with biofuels within the Netherlands.

Definately not alone and BP is. the planetis main oil firms have possibly completely divested from alternative-energy or somewhat decreased, although you’dnot understand it from their marketing their opportunities in support of doubling-down on ever-more harmful and dangerous resources of natural and fat gas.

Not that these obligations to options were actually especially great. Utilizing quotes that are extremely large, BP retains the gas business report for that greatest proportion of expenses committed with only 6 percentage of its general expenses in 2011, to options, before it began selling its procedures off. A remote second runs with levels of 2.5 percent; 1 percent has actually actually damaged.

“The main point here is the fact that a fall was just spent by gas firms within the container [in options] even of the first 1980s yet in the ‘heyday’,” says vicepresident of investment company MSCI ESG Study, Douglas Cogan. “All of The biggest [gas business] traders have fallen out following a precedent that Exxon established 30 years before, recently.”

Consider ConocoPhillips, which illustrates its “growing systems and alternative-energy resources” actions on its site – but does not note that in April 2012 it divested many of these actions to concentrate solely on its “primary company” of discovering for and creating fat and gas, and particularly to make the most of the United States “shale innovation” and tar sands output in Canada. “ConocoPhillips is definitely gas business and an independent oil,” suggests a representative. “We don’t have an energetic green power section inside our profile.”

The recently produced Phillips 66 (currently the 3rd-biggest U.S. gas business) required over ConocoPhillips’ “downstream” actions – indicating anything after pursuit and manufacturing. Apart from restricted expense in second-generation Phillips 66, biofuel study, also, has forgotten options.

What the planet’s biggest company is ­–ed by about Layer, based on Bundle? This year, the organization released an advertisement strategy named “Let Us Move,” marketing its initiatives to “expand the planetis power blend.” Today, the ads continue to be operating. However another account is told by the figures. Layer stories investing about $400-million annually from the $23 million it allocated to all expenditures, on options. At its maximum in 2007, Layer spent simply 2.5 percentage of its complete cash costs on options. It is right down to 1.5 percent nowadays.

Layer keeps just small opportunities in some hydrogen research and breeze today and forgotten solar in 2006. The majority of the alternate opportunities of Layer nowadays have been in biofuels. Meanwhile, it pushes forward using the planetis greatest offshore gas properly within the Gulf and will not do significantly more than “stop” ideas for going within the U.S. Arctic – despite among its exploration stations went aground in Kodiak, Alaska in January.

Just like each one of these businesses, the expenses that Layer reviews openly on options are challenging confirm or to pin-down. Layer contains the cash it stays on carbon record projects and “additional CO2 associated function”; neither one is definitely an alternate power source, although both are good. BP, likewise, employs the mystical expression “reduce-carbon companies.” For this, no main gas business has actually invested enough on options actually to add up to actually ten percent of belongings or its profits – Exchange Commissionis and the Protection limit for reporting needs on monetary expenses.

This year, Chevron released its “We Acknowledge” relations strategy, with advertisements saying “It Is period gas firms get behind green energy’s improvement,” today that run. However the alternate opportunities of Chevron have now been slipping for a long time, not increasing, like a percentage of its overall expenses: From 2.5 percentage of general expenditures in 2008, alternative-energy decreased to 1.5 percent in 2012 and 2.3 percentage this year.

In 2011, the Corporate Accountability statement of Chevron – which have been a display – introduced the organization might consider “a practical strategy” to these opportunities, concentrating on geothermal power, next generation biofuels and effectiveness options. However biofuels and breeze are noticeably missing in the 2012 statement; what “substitute energy” and “green energy” don’t seem everywhere in its websites. ” $5.4 million was invested by Chevron on alternative-energy from 2002 to 2012,” says company representative Morgan Crinklaw. That is about $500-million annually, out-of $34 million overall expenses in 2012. (This number contains the job of its personal part, Chevron Energy Options, which works on solar, but doesn’t need to supply public disclosure of its funds.) Chevron remains among the planetis oiliest gas organizations, with one of gas resources one of the majors’ greatest rates.

Like ConocoPhillips, the country’s fifth-largest gas business, Race, divested its activities for related factors – to be able to increase its shale and sand procedures. It keeps partial possession of the methanol place that changes gas into engine gas, as the recently spun nowadays -off MPC contains ethanol in its profile.

Into options, some businesses were never obviously. Since 2002, Exxonmobil, which required in $45 million in revenue this past year place of $188 million into its alternate opportunities, set alongside the $250 thousand it focused on U.S. marketing within the last couple of years. (This number and formerly reported marketing information were supplied by Kantar Media.)

It is worth mentioning one minor exception towards the pattern: the planetis 9th, Englandis Complete -biggest gas business, which significantly improved its procedures that are solar . But Complete, also, had quite a distance to enhance. The most recent available numbers from MSCI ESG Study set through 2010 from 2005 just about $84 thousand annually, or, at-best, significantly less than 0.6 percentage of total expenses. Furthermore, the pretty substantial coal procedures of the company’s stand towards the great it is performing in options in comparison.

You will find obvious explanations why some opportunities stay while solar and breeze have all-but vanished. Because 2009, both the Eu and also the U.S. have experienced guidelines in position needing biofuels in engine gas, when compared with on-again, off- tax breaks for breeze and solar power. And why bother placing actual opportunities in options at-all, when the general public have previously persuaded the businesses continue to be “green”?

The truth is, all the businesses are placing more and more assets toward filthy power resources which were no time before available – or no time before deemed appropriate. With minimal legislation and error, and with lots of subsidies and tax-breaks, all the businesses mentioned below are upping their gas and gas antes by positioning further than ever in to the seas (including Exxon within the Russian Arctic), growing procedures within the Canadian tar sands, significantly growing hydraulic fracking in ever more areas of the U.S. and the planet, and – using the exclusion of ConocoPhillips – shopping and positioning for gas in Iraq and/or Kurdistan. Should you pass what Exxon vice president J.S everything makes sense. Simon advised Congress in 2008: “[T]he quest for substitute fuels mustn’t deter in the improvement of gas and oil.”